Consultant en nommage

Winner: canUserAccessDocument

• Reading-aloud test: “Can user access document?” Clear and natural.
• Implies: Returns a boolean after evaluating all relevant authorization factors.
• Mis-implies: May sound broader than role, ownership, and sharing settings if other access rules exist.

hasDocumentAccess

• Reading-aloud test: “User has document access.” Concise and fluent at call sites.
• Implies: Checks whether the current or supplied user has access.
• Mis-implies: Without parameters or context, it may be unclear which user is being checked.

isDocumentAccessibleByUser

• Reading-aloud test: “Is document accessible by user?” Precise, though slightly formal.
• Implies: A boolean accessibility decision for a specific user and document.
• Mis-implies: “Accessible” can be confused with disability/accessibility compliance.

canAccessDocument

• Reading-aloud test: “Can access document?” Natural when called as user.canAccessDocument(document).
• Implies: Evaluates authorization to access the document.
• Mis-implies: In a standalone utility, the subject may be ambiguous.

isDocumentAccessAllowed

• Reading-aloud test: “Is document access allowed?” Clear and policy-oriented.
• Implies: Produces a definitive allow/deny result from access rules.
• Mis-implies: Does not explicitly identify the user as part of the decision.

isUserAuthorizedForDocument

• Reading-aloud test: “Is user authorized for document?” Understandable but somewhat stiff.
• Implies: Performs an authorization check covering multiple policy factors.
• Mis-implies: May suggest permission to perform every action, not merely access or viewing.

evaluateDocumentAccess

• Reading-aloud test: “Evaluate document access.” Clear, but not obviously boolean.
• Implies: Applies role, ownership, and sharing rules to reach a